Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Fiat Scudo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Fiat Scudo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Scudo, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Fiat Scudo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Fiat Scudo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Scudo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Scudo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.94 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Caravelle is 9 cm longer than the Fiat Scudo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Fiat Scudo has
| |