Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 12.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |