Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |