Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 85 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.29 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 44 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2297 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |