Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 17 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caravelle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caravelle over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.29 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.75 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 15 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 638 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3296 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |