Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 65 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.5 | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.29 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.94 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 51 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
5800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caravelle is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |