Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | 163 mm (6.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Caravelle can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Caravelle version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
5800 litres | 2430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`954 kg | 1`728 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`046 kg | 642 kg | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Volkswagen Caravelle is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |