Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 120 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.4 | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caravelle over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2297 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |