Volkswagen Caravelle 1990 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.9 - 3.5 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 204 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 250 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 - 28.5 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Caravelle equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 12 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
| |