Volkswagen Caravelle 1990 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 3.5 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 204 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 250 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 - 28.5 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Caravelle equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 256 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caravelle has 284 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |