Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 204 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 400 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 22.2 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 10.4 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Volkswagen Caravelle equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 809 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`983 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |