Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Vento engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
10.6
11.0
Real fuel consumption:
10.1 l/100km
11.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Vento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity:
55 litres
62 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
510 km in combined cycle
560 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway
750 km on highway
540 km with real consumption
560 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Volkswagen Bora 1998: Vehicle is equipped with 4motion automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions, the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-plate clutch engages and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%).
Dimensions
Length:
4.38 m
4.38 m
Width:
1.71 m
1.74 m
Height:
1.40 m
1.45 m
Volkswagen Vento and Volkswagen Bora are practically the same length.
