Volkswagen Vento 1992 vs Volvo 850 1996

 
Volkswagen Vento
1992 - 1998
Volvo 850
1996 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP140 HP
Torque: 150 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Vento engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Vento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1400 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1100 km with real consumption
Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Vento engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Seat Toledo, Seat IbizaInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Vento might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.67 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Vento is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Vento is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Vento is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data445 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Vento is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 850.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`960
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 8001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Vento has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv