Volkswagen Vento 1992 vs Volkswagen Polo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Vento is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Vento engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Vento could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Polo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Vento is larger. Volkswagen Vento is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Vento is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 762 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Vento is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Vento has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |