Volkswagen Vento 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 1996

 
Volkswagen Vento
1995 - 1998
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 64 HP64 HP
Torque: 124 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.3 seconds16.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Vento and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Vento torque is 1 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.5 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Vento could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1120 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.14 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Vento is larger.
Volkswagen Vento is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Vento is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data762 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Vento is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`500
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Vento has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv