Volkswagen Vento 1992 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Vento engine produces 43 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Vento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
| Volkswagen Vento is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Vento is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Vento is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Vento has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |