Volkswagen Vento 1992 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Vento engine produces 26 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Vento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Vento might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Volkswagen Vento is 10 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Vento is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Vento is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Volkswagen Vento can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Vento has
|
Audi 80 has
| |