Volkswagen Vento 1993 vs Honda Civic 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Vento engine produces 35 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Vento reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Vento could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Vento consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Vento is 8 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Vento is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`570 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |