Volkswagen Vento 1992 vs Volkswagen Polo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.8 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 174 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 116 - 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 18.3 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 11.6 | 4.9 - 9.0 | |
|
Volkswagen Vento petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Volkswagen Vento equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Vento is larger. Volkswagen Vento is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 762 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Vento is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`167 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |