Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 80 NM less than BMW 4 series. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Scirocco is 38 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 312 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1006 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Scirocco has 133 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`995 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`375 kg | 1`475 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 405 kg | 520 kg | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than BMW 4 series. Therefore, BMW 4 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |