Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

 
Volkswagen Scirocco
2014 - 2017
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP85 HP
Torque: 200 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds12.1 seconds
Volkswagen Scirocco is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Scirocco over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway950 km on highway
840 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Scirocco gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 1.4 engine: The engine is reliable, however, owners frequently report excessive oil consumption, which is usually linked to piston ring issues. Loss of power is another common complaint. It's advised against maintaining ...  More about Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m3.97 m
Width: 1.81 m1.68 m
Height: 1.41 m1.49 m
Volkswagen Scirocco is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Scirocco is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 13 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 312 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1006 litres952 litres
Volkswagen Scirocco has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Scirocco has 32 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Scirocco (by 54 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`6801`550
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Scirocco, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16 4003600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Scirocco has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv