Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 vs BMW 1 series 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 30 HP more power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 70 NM more than BMW 1 series. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 1 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Scirocco could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 1 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Tiguan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 1 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco is 11 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
755 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Scirocco has 78 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| BMW 1 series has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Scirocco, so BMW 1 series quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |