Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 vs Audi TT 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Scirocco could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Scirocco might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.35 m | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco is 8 cm longer than the Audi TT, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1006 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco has 2 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Scirocco has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
Audi TT has
| |