Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 vs BMW 3 series 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 37 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Scirocco could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Scirocco engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
Volkswagen Scirocco is 33 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1006 litres | no data | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Scirocco has 148 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Volkswagen Scirocco has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Volkswagen Scirocco quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 7200 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |