Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 vs Audi TT 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 60 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 40 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Scirocco over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Scirocco gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Scirocco might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.35 m | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco is 8 cm longer than the Audi TT, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1006 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco has 2 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Scirocco has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
Audi TT has
| |