Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 168 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 10.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Scirocco over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Scirocco is 58 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1006 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Volkswagen Scirocco has 72 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |