Volkswagen Scirocco 1982 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 10 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Scirocco over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Neon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco is smaller. Volkswagen Scirocco is 34 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1195 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |