Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volvo S40 2000

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1986
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 184 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.7 seconds
Volkswagen Passat and Volvo S40 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Passat torque is 6 NM less than Volvo S40. Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.3
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S40 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv