Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1986
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2002
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP115 HP
Torque: 165 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat and Volkswagen Bora have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Passat torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.18.9
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.38 m
Width: 1.71 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data785 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`810
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 16001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Bora has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv