Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volvo S40 1996

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1986
Volvo S40
1996 - 1999
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP140 HP
Torque: 165 NM183 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.7 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.09.0
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`720
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1600600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv