Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volvo S40 2000

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1986
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP122 HP
Torque: 145 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.38.9
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Passat engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi 80, Audi CoupeUsed also on Volvo V40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Volkswagen Passat engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv