Volkswagen Passat 1986 vs Volvo S40 1995

 
Volkswagen Passat
1986 - 1988
Volvo S40
1995 - 1999
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 72 HP105 HP
Torque: 120 NM143 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds13 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 33 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.78.5
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data415 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S40 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv