Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Mazda 626 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.6 | |
| Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 502 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |