Volkswagen Passat 2012 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Volkswagen Passat
2012 -
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP165 HP
Torque: 250 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds8.2 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 40 NM more than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.75.8
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1060 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.47 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.52 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 30 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 588 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1334 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 224 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1701`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 16 2009600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv