Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Volvo V60 2016

 
Volkswagen Passat
2014 - 2019
Volvo V60
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP122 HP
Torque: 200 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.3 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo V60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V60. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.9
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1490 km on highway1360 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat 2014 1.4 engine: The engine is reliable, however, owners frequently report excessive oil consumption, which is usually linked to piston ring issues. Loss of power is another common complaint. It's advised against maintaining ...  More about Volkswagen Passat 2014 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.50 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 14 cm longer than the Volvo V60, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 651 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1780 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 221 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters13.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`960no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Volvo V60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 13 20012 000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo V60 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv