Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

	Volkswagen Passat 2000 - 2002	Volkswagen Bora 1998 - 2002
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	115 HP	115 HP
Torque:	172 NM	170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	12 seconds	12 seconds
	Volkswagen Passat and Volkswagen Bora have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Passat torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.6	8.9
Real fuel consumption:	10.1 l/100km	10.1 l/100km
	The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	640 km in combined cycle	610 km in combined cycle
	820 km on highway	800 km on highway
	610 km with real consumption	540 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.70 m	4.38 m
Width:	1.75 m	1.74 m
Height:	1.46 m	1.45 m
	Volkswagen Passat is larger. Volkswagen Passat is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	475 litres	455 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	785 litres
	Volkswagen Passat has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora.
Turning diameter:	11 meters	11 meters
Gross weight (kg):	1`930	1`810

Safety:		no data
Quality:	average	no data
Average price (€):	1400	1400
Rating in user reviews:	7.9/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:		Volkswagen Bora has lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions