Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Kia Magentis 2003

 
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Kia Magentis
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 130 HP136 HP
Torque: 310 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds11.5 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 6 HP less power than Kia Magentis, but torque is 133 NM more than Kia Magentis. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.68.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Magentis, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Magentis.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway920 km on highway
950 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.73 m
Width: 1.75 m1.82 m
Height: 1.46 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Passat is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Magentis, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 475 litres479 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data810 litres
Volkswagen Passat has 4 litres less trunk space than the Kia Magentis.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia Magentis, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`985
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 14001600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv