Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Volvo S60
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 100 HP130 HP
Torque: 250 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S60.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.5
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway1370 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.58 m
Width: 1.75 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Passat is 12 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 475 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 51 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9402`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv