Volkswagen Passat 2009 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Volkswagen Passat
2009 - 2010
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 152 HP180 HP
Torque: n/a NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds9.5 seconds
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 28 HP less power than Volvo S60. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.210.0
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway920 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 19 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 565 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 141 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0702`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 22002800
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv