Volkswagen Passat 2005 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 102 HP180 HP
Torque: 148 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds8.8 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 78 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.79.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway980 km on highway
890 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Volkswagen Passat 2005 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners. Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ...  More about Volkswagen Passat 2005 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 565 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 141 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9502`010
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better
Average price (€): 22002800
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv