Volkswagen Passat 2009 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat engine produces 9 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, but torque is 29 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 9.6 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat and Chevrolet Evanda are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |