Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat and Volkswagen Passat CC have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
1060 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Passat is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 532 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 33 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. The Volkswagen Passat CC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 5400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
| |