Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volvo S80 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 51 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.4 | |
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
Volkswagen Passat is smaller. Volkswagen Passat is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 480 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 5600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 9.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |