Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, but torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volkswagen Passat has 47 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |