Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat engine produces 38 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| 1020 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat 2010 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 33 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. The Volkswagen Passat CC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |