Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo V60. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1570 km in combined cycle | 1510 km in combined cycle | |
| 1730 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat is 14 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat has 220 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 2`180 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`701 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 640 kg | 479 kg | |
| Volkswagen Passat load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Volvo V60. Therefore, Volkswagen Passat is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |