Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Volkswagen Passat
2010 - 2014
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP145 HP
Torque: 200 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 23 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.15.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1310 km on highway
1020 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.80 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 603 litres502 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 101 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0901`980
Safety:
Mazda 6 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Passat, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 54007400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv