Volkswagen Passat 2005 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat engine produces 24 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat is 2 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 203 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Rover 75 has
| |