Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat engine produces 79 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 28 NM more than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.58 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 464 litres | |
| Volkswagen Passat has 14 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |