Volkswagen Passat 1999 vs Audi 80 1992

	Volkswagen Passat 1999 - 2000	Audi 80 1992 - 1995
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.5 Diesel	2.6 Petrol
Performance
Power:	150 HP	150 HP
Torque:	310 NM	225 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	11 seconds	11.2 seconds
	Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat and Audi 80 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Passat torque is 85 NM more than Audi 80. Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.1	10.1
Real fuel consumption:	8.1 l/100km	12.1 l/100km
	The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	66 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	760 km in combined cycle	650 km in combined cycle
	760 km with real consumption	540 km with real consumption
	Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Volkswagen Passat 1999 2.5 engine: The 2.5 TDI engine is known for several recurring issues, many of which significantly affect reliability if not addressed promptly. One of the most common problems is rapid wear of camshaft lobes or rocker ... More about Volkswagen Passat 1999 2.5 engine
Dimensions
Length:	4.67 m	4.48 m
Width:	1.74 m	1.70 m
Height:	1.50 m	1.41 m
	Volkswagen Passat is larger. Volkswagen Passat is 19 cm longer than the Audi 80, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	450 litres	370 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1200 litres
	Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat has 80 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter:	11 meters	11.2 meters
	The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg):	2`100	1`940

Safety:		no data
Quality:	below average	below average
	Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	1000	800
Rating in user reviews:	7.3/10	7.3/10
Pros and Cons:	Volkswagen Passat has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage roomier boot fewer faults	Audi 80 has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volkswagen Passat 1999 vs Audi 80 1992

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions